Close Menu
    Latest Category
    • Finance
    • Tech
    • EU Law
    • Energy
    • About
    • Contact
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Login
    • EU News
    • Focus
    • Guides
    • Press
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • Directory
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Home » adidas 3-stripe trademark invalid: EU Court

    adidas 3-stripe trademark invalid: EU Court

    npsnps20 June 2019Updated:25 June 2024
    — Filed under: EU Law EU News Headline2 Trade Mark
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    adidas 3-stripe trademark invalid: EU Court

    Photo Markus Spiske

    (LUXEMBOURG) – The adidas EU trade mark, which consists of three parallel stripes applied in any direction, is invalid, the EU’s top Court ruled Wednesday, as the firm failed to prove the mark’s distinctive character.

    In 2014, the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) registered, in favour of adidas, the following EU trade mark for clothing, footwear and headgear.

    In its application for registration, adidas had described the mark as consisting of three parallel equidistant stripes of identical width, applied on the product in any direction.

    In 2016, following an application for declaration of invalidity filed by the Belgian undertaking Shoe Branding Europe BVBA, EUIPO annulled the registration of that mark on the ground that it was devoid of any distinctive character, both inherent and acquired through use. According to EUIPO, the mark should not have been registered. In particular, adidas had failed to establish that the mark had acquired distinctive character through use throughout the EU.

    In its judgment, the General Court upholds the annulment decision, dismissing the action brought by adidas against the EUIPO decision.

    The General Court notes, first of all, that the mark is not a pattern mark composed of a series of regularly repetitive elements, but an ordinary figurative mark.

    The General Court also finds that the forms of use which fail to respect the other essential characteristics of the mark, such as its colour scheme (black stripes against white background), cannot be taken into account.

    Therefore, the Court says EUIPO was correct to dismiss numerous pieces of evidence produced by adidas on the ground that they concern other signs, such as, in particular, signs for which the colour scheme had been reversed (white stripes against black background).

    Finally, the General Court notes that EUIPO did not commit an error of assessment in finding that adidas had not proved that the mark at issue had been used throughout the territory of the European Union and that it had acquired, in the whole of that territory, distinctive character following the use which had been made of it. From the evidence produced by adidas, the only evidence which is, to some extent, relevant relates to only five Member States and cannot, in the present case, be extrapolated to the entire territory of the EU.

    NOTE: EU trade marks are valid for the entire territory of the EU and coexist with national trade marks.Applications for registration of a EU trade mark are addressed to EUIPO. Actions against its decisions may be brought before the General Court.

    Judgment in Case T-307/17 adidas AG v EUIPO

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    nps
    • Website

    Related Content

    Image by der_niels from Pixabay

    EuroCommerce on UTP cross-border enforcement regulation: common sense prevailed

    Sponsor: EuroCommerce5 March 2026
    EUSPA logo

    Facility Specialist, European Union Agency for the Space Programme, EUSPA

    Michael McGrath - Photo © European Union 2026

    Cosmetics the most dangerous products on EU market

    Global warming - Image by Tumisu from Pixabay

    Final green light for amended EU climate law

    Legal Adviser – Legal & Executive Affairs, EFTA Surveillance Authority, ESA

    Energy storage facilities of Energy Cells in Vilnius, Lithuania - Photo Adas Vasiliauskas © European Union 2012

    A first spark for clean products, but the Industrial Accelerator Act needs more voltage

    Sponsor: WWF4 March 2026
    LATEST EU NEWS
    Michael McGrath - Photo © European Union 2026

    Cosmetics the most dangerous products on EU market

    5 March 2026
    Global warming - Image by Tumisu from Pixabay

    Final green light for amended EU climate law

    5 March 2026
    Hamburg shipyard - Image by Manne1953 from Pixabay

    EU adopts maritime strategy for ports, shipping and shipbuilding

    4 March 2026
    Stéphane Séjourné - Photo © European Union 2026

    EU boost for manufacturing with clean products ‘made in Europe’

    4 March 2026
    Parmelin - von der Leyen - Photo by Dati Bendo © European Union 2026

    EU and Switzerland strengthen ties with package of agreements

    2 March 2026

    Subscribe to EUbusiness Week

    Get the latest EU news

    CONTACT INFO

    • EUbusiness, 117 High Street, Chesham Buckinghamshire, HP5 1DE, United Kingdom
    • +44(0)20 8058 8232
    • service@eubusiness.com

    INFORMATION

    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Contact Info

    Services

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • EU News

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    Facebook
    eubusiness.com © EUbusiness Ltd 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below.

    Lost password?