Close Menu
    Latest Category
    • Finance
    • Tech
    • EU Law
    • Energy
    • About
    • Contact
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Login
    • EU News
    • Focus
    • Guides
    • Press
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • Directory
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Home » Barcelona, Real Madrid ‘in breach of EU state aid rules’

    Barcelona, Real Madrid ‘in breach of EU state aid rules’

    npsnps5 July 2016Updated:25 June 2024
    — Filed under: Competition EU News Headline2 Sport
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Barcelona, Real Madrid 'in breach of EU state aid rules'

    Photo © Rui Araujo – Fotolia

    (BRUSSELS) – Barcelona and Real Madrid were among seven Spanish football clubs deemed by the European Commission Monday to have been granted unfair advantage under EU state aid rules.

    Following three separate in-depth investigations, the EU executive decided that public support measures granted by Spain to seven professional football clubs – also including Valencia, Athletic Bilbao, Atletico Osasuna, Elche and Hercules – gave the clubs an unfair advantage over other clubs.

    Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager said that using taxpayers’ money to finance professional football clubs creates unfair competition: “Professional football is a commercial activity with significant money involved and public money must comply with fair competition rules. The subsidies we investigated in these cases did not.”

    EU State aid rules apply to public interventions in the market to ensure that they do not distort competition by selectively favouring one market participant over another. Professional sport is an economic activity. Football clubs conduct marketing, merchandising, TV broadcasting, transfer of players etc., and compete at international level. In many cases, professional football clubs have significant turnover. EU State aid rules ensure that public funding does not distort competition between clubs. They protect the level playing field for the majority of professional clubs who have to operate without subsidies.

    The first investigation concerned tax privileges in favour of Real Madrid, FC Barcelona, Athletic Bilbao and Atlético Osasuna. In Spain, professional football clubs are considered as limited liability companies for tax purposes. However, these four clubs were treated as non-profit organisations, which pay a 5% lower tax rate on profit than limited liability companies. The four clubs benefitted from this lower tax rate during over twenty years, without an objective justification. Spain has in the meantime adjusted its legislation on corporate taxation to end this discriminatory treatment effective as of January 2016. To remove the undue advantage received in the past, the clubs now have to return the unpaid taxes. Based on available information the Commission estimates that the amounts that need to be recovered are limited (€0-5 million per club) but the precise amounts that need to be paid back are to be determined by the Spanish authorities in the recovery process.

    In a second investigation, the Commission examined a land transfer between Real Madrid and the City of Madrid. The inquiry determined, based on an independent study, that the land affected by the transaction was overvalued by €18.4 million. This gave Real Madrid an unjustified advantage over other clubs, which it now needs to pay back.

    Finally, the Commission investigated guarantees given by the State-owned Valencia Institute of Finance (IVF) for loans granted to three Valencia football clubs (Valencia, Hercules and Elche). At the time, those clubs were in financial difficulties. The public guarantee allowed the clubs to obtain the loans on more favourable terms. As the clubs paid no adequate remuneration for the guarantees, this gave them an economic advantage over other clubs, who have to raise money without state backing. The state financing was not linked to any restructuring plan to make the clubs viable and none of them implemented compensatory measures to offset the distortion of competition created by the subsidy. In order to restore the level playing field with non-subsidised clubs, Valencia, Hercules and Elche now have to pay back the advantage they received. This amounts to €20.4 million for Valencia, €6.1 million for Hercules and €3.7 million for Elche.

    The Commission also adopted decisions concerning State aid to five Dutch football clubs.

    The non-confidential version of the current decision is being made available under the case numbers SA.29769 (tax privileges for Real Madrid CF, FC Barcelona, Athletic Club Bilbao, Club Atlético Osasuna), SA.33754 (Real Madrid) and SA.36387 (for Valencia, Hercules and Elche)in the State Aid Register on the DG Competition website once any confidentiality issues have been resolved. New publications of State aid decisions on the internet and in the Official Journal are listed in the State Aid Weekly e-News.

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    nps
    • Website

    Related Content

    Single market - lorry delivery - Image by Maickel Althuizen from Pixabay

    Better regulation starts with putting the ‘Think Small First’ principle into practice

    Sponsor: SMEunited30 April 2026
    Sustainable finance - Image by Nattanan Kanchanaprat from Pixabay

    Largest companies in France still unprepared for nature transition, finds WWF

    Sponsor: WWF30 April 2026
    Fishing boat

    EU Fisheries Policy evaluation confirms the framework works – now Member States must deliver

    Sponsor: WWF30 April 2026
    Mercosur signing - Maros Sefcovic - Photo © European Union 2026

    EU-Mercosur interim trade deal to enter into provisional application

    Justice law hammer - Image by succo from Pixabay

    April 2026 EU infringements package: key decisions

    Legal stamp - Image by Markus Spiske on Pexels

    UK Business Selling to The EU? When and Why Would You Have To Use An Apostille

    LATEST EU NEWS
    Mercosur signing - Maros Sefcovic - Photo © European Union 2026

    EU-Mercosur interim trade deal to enter into provisional application

    30 April 2026
    Pet dog at vet - Image by Tima Miroshnichenko on Pexels

    Green light for first EU rules to protect cats and dogs

    28 April 2026
    Rice sacks trade - Image by Thilina Alagiyawanna on Pexels

    Renewed EU trade instrument for development set for 2027

    28 April 2026
    Artificial intelligence - Image by Kohji Asakawa from Pixabay

    Brussels consults on Google measures to give Android users choice on AI services

    28 April 2026
    Car crash - Image by Rico Lob from Pixabay

    Road fatalities in the EU down 2.2 pct in 2024

    27 April 2026

    Subscribe to EUbusiness Week

    Get the latest EU news

    CONTACT INFO

    • EUbusiness, 117 High Street, Chesham Buckinghamshire, HP5 1DE, United Kingdom
    • +44(0)20 8058 8232
    • service@eubusiness.com

    INFORMATION

    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Contact Info

    Services

    • Cookie Policy
    • Terms
    • Disclaimer

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    Facebook
    eubusiness.com © EUbusiness Ltd 2026

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Manage Consent
    To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
    Functional Always active
    The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
    Preferences
    The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
    Statistics
    The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
    Marketing
    The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
    • Manage options
    • Manage services
    • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
    • Read more about these purposes
    View preferences
    • {title}
    • {title}
    • {title}

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below.

    Lost password?