Close Menu
    Latest Category
    • Finance
    • Tech
    • EU Law
    • Energy
    • About
    • Contact
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Login
    • EU News
    • Focus
    • Guides
    • Press
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • Directory
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Home » Co-ordinating Member States’ direct tax systems

    Co-ordinating Member States’ direct tax systems

    Ina DimirevaIna Dimireva27 November 2009 EU Law
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    — last modified 08 December 2009

    The initiatives announced in this Communication aim to promote greater co-ordination of the Member States’ direct tax systems in order to remove fiscal barriers and to eliminate discrimination and double taxation at a European Union (EU) level. The aim of co-ordinating the unharmonised direct tax systems of the Member States is to render them compatible with Community law and European Court of Justice case law. Two of the initiatives concern the specific areas of exit taxation and offsetting of cross-border losses for companies and groups.


    Advertisement


    ACT

    Communication of 19 December 2006 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee – Co-ordinating Member States’ direct tax systems in the Internal Market [COM(2006) 823 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

    SUMMARY

    The European Commission announces a series of initiatives intended to promote better co-ordination of the national direct tax systems in the Union. The aim is to ensure that national tax systems comply with Community law and interact coherently with each other. The initiatives seek to eliminate discrimination and double taxation for the benefit of individuals and businesses, while simultaneously helping to combat tax evasion and to preserve the tax base.

    The main objectives of a coherent and co-ordinated tax approach are to:

    • Eliminate discrimination and double taxation,
    • Prevent unintended non-taxation and evasion, and
    • Reduce the compliance costs associated with being subject to more than one tax system.

    In addition to this Communication, the Commission has adopted two other communications, the first concerning offsetting of cross-border losses, and the second concerning exit taxation. These are the first two concrete examples of specific areas in which a co-ordinated approach could prove to be beneficial.

    Background

    Under Community law Member States are largely free to design their direct tax systems so as to meet their domestic policy objectives and requirements. However, national tax rules designed solely or primarily with the domestic situation in mind may give rise to incoherent tax treatment when applied in a cross-border context. An individual or corporate taxpayer in a cross-border situation may suffer discrimination or double taxation or may face additional costs through having to comply with several different rules.

    The sharp increase in litigation by taxpayers in national courts and the European Court of Justice over the last few years highlights the need for improved co-operation and better co-ordination between Member States.

    Aims

    The purpose of this Commission initiative is to promote solutions to the common problems posed by the interaction of multiple tax systems in the context of the Internal Market. By coming forward with this initiative, the European Commission demonstrates its willingness to assist Member States in developing the principles for co-ordinated solutions and in improving the practical arrangements for administrative co-operation.

    This Commission initiative does not seek to replace existing national tax systems with a uniform Community system. It seeks, above all, to improve co-operation between the Member States and the co-ordination of their respective legislations in order to ensure the smooth functioning of the twenty-seven different national systems in the context of the Internal Market.

    In addition to the specific areas covered by the two accompanying communications, this Communication also identifies other areas of direct taxation (withholding taxes, anti-avoidance measures, inheritance taxes, etc.) where the Commission considers there is a need for a co-ordinated approach.

    Co-ordination and harmonisation of the corporate tax base

    This initiative for the co-ordination of fiscal systems complements the Commission’s ongoing legislative initiatives in the direct tax area. The Commission believes that the only systematic means of addressing the underlying tax obstacles which exist for companies operating in more than one Member State is to allow multinational groups to be taxed for all of their activities in the EU on a common consolidated corporate tax base. The Commission has announced its intention to present a comprehensive legislative proposal for such a Common Consolidated Corporate Tax Base (CCCTB) in 2008. However, the CCCTB will only apply to companies which are eligible and opt for it. There is still a more general need to ensure better co-ordination of national fiscal systems for the benefit of individuals and companies, and to prevent the erosion of Member States’ tax bases.

    Possible Areas for Co-ordination between the Member States

    In conjunction with this Communication, the Commission has published two communications in the specific areas of exit taxation and offsetting of cross-border losses for companies and groups.

    Exit taxation

    The area of exit taxation concerns, in particular, tax on the transfer of assets to another jurisdiction in another Member State. In the communication on exit taxation, which concerns the taxation of individuals and companies, the Commission sets out proposals for the manner in which the Member States could co-ordinate their action in order to eliminate discrimination or double taxation.

    Offsetting cross-border losses

    Where cross-border losses are not offset for companies and groups, their profits and losses risk being allocated across different jurisdictions. If this occurs, offsetting of the losses sustained by the companies and groups is restricted to profits earned in the Member State in which the investment was made. Consequently, the groups and companies risk paying tax on a base which is greater than their total EU-wide profit. This situation also leads to a reduction in competitiveness, and it is for this reason that the Commission proposes a co-ordinated approach by Member States in this area.

    RELATED ACTS

    Exit Taxation and Offsetting of Cross-border Losses

    Communication of 19 December 2006 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee – Exit taxation and the need to coordinate Member States’ fiscal policies [COM(2006) 825 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

    Communication of 19 December 2006 from the Commission to the Council, the European Parliament and the European Economic and Social Committee – The tax treatment of losses in cross-border situations [COM(2006) 824 final – Not published in the Official Journal].

    Further information is available on the European Commission Taxation and Customs Union DG website.

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    Ina Dimireva

      Related Content

      EFTA Surveillance Authority

      Legal Officer – Internal Market Affairs – Transport, EFTA Surveillance Authority, ESA

      Bankruptcy - Image by Michael Schüller from Pixabay

      EU Council greenlights common EU rules for insolvency proceedings

      Law - EU Court of Justice - Photo © European Union 2026

      March 2026 EU infringements package: key decisions

      EFTA Surveillance Authority

      Legal Adviser – Legal & Executive Affairs, EFTA Surveillance Authority, ESA

      Academy of European Law logo

      Lawyer (Course Director) in European Competition Law and European Public Procurement Law, Academy of European Law

      Justice law hammer - Image by succo from Pixabay

      EU January 2026 infringements package: key decisions

      LATEST EU NEWS
      Chocolate - Image by jacqueline macou from Pixabay

      Brussels carries out antitrust raids in chocolate confectionery sector

      14 April 2026
      Pharmaceuticals - Photo by Laurynas Me on Unsplash

      EU has EUR 221 bn trade surplus on medicinal & pharma products

      14 April 2026
      Steel melting pool - Photo by Kateryna Babaieva on Pexels

      Deal reached on measures to protect EU steel market

      14 April 2026
      Entry exit system - Warsaw - Photo by MART PRODUCTION on Pexels

      EU’s Entry/Exit System fully operational at Schengen borders

      12 April 2026
      Trade in cars - Photo by Tom Fisk on Pexels

      EU trade deficit with China EUR 359.8 bn in 2025

      10 April 2026

      Subscribe to EUbusiness Week

      Get the latest EU news

      CONTACT INFO

      • EUbusiness, 117 High Street, Chesham Buckinghamshire, HP5 1DE, United Kingdom
      • +44(0)20 8058 8232
      • service@eubusiness.com

      INFORMATION

      • About Us
      • Advertising
      • Contact Info

      Services

      • Cookie Policy
      • Terms
      • Disclaimer

      SOCIAL MEDIA

      Facebook
      eubusiness.com © EUbusiness Ltd 2026

      Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

      Manage Consent
      To provide the best experiences, we use technologies like cookies to store and/or access device information. Consenting to these technologies will allow us to process data such as browsing behavior or unique IDs on this site. Not consenting or withdrawing consent, may adversely affect certain features and functions.
      Functional Always active
      The technical storage or access is strictly necessary for the legitimate purpose of enabling the use of a specific service explicitly requested by the subscriber or user, or for the sole purpose of carrying out the transmission of a communication over an electronic communications network.
      Preferences
      The technical storage or access is necessary for the legitimate purpose of storing preferences that are not requested by the subscriber or user.
      Statistics
      The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for statistical purposes. The technical storage or access that is used exclusively for anonymous statistical purposes. Without a subpoena, voluntary compliance on the part of your Internet Service Provider, or additional records from a third party, information stored or retrieved for this purpose alone cannot usually be used to identify you.
      Marketing
      The technical storage or access is required to create user profiles to send advertising, or to track the user on a website or across several websites for similar marketing purposes.
      • Manage options
      • Manage services
      • Manage {vendor_count} vendors
      • Read more about these purposes
      View preferences
      • {title}
      • {title}
      • {title}

      Sign In or Register

      Welcome Back!

      Login to your account below.

      Lost password?