Close Menu
    Latest Category
    • Finance
    • Tech
    • EU Law
    • Energy
    • About
    • Contact
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Login
    • EU News
    • Focus
    • Guides
    • Press
    • Jobs
    • Events
    • Directory
    EUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politicsEUbusiness.com | EU news, business and politics
    Home » Austria’s Good Friday law discriminatory: EU Court

    Austria’s Good Friday law discriminatory: EU Court

    npsBy nps24 January 2019Updated:25 June 2024 No Comments5 Mins Read
    — Filed under: Austria EU Law - employment EU News Headline2 religion
    Share
    Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Email
    Austria's Good Friday law discriminatory: EU Court

    Church

    (LUXEMBOURG) – Austria’s granting of a paid public holiday on Good Friday only to employees who are members of certain churches constitutes religious discrimination prohibited under EU law, the EU’s top Court has ruled.

    In its ruling, the European Court of Justice said that until Austria amends its legislation in order to restore equal treatment, a private employer must, subject to certain conditions, also grant his other employees a paid public holiday on Good Friday.

    In Austria, where the majority of the population belongs to the Roman Catholic Church, Good Friday is a paid public holiday, but only for members of the Evangelical Churches of the Augsburg and Helvetic Confessions, the Old Catholic Church and the United Methodist Church. This special regime allows members of those churches to practise their religion on a religious holiday that is particularly important for them, without having to obtain their employer’s consent to take a day’s leave.

    If a member of one of those churches works on that day, he is entitled to additional pay in respect of that public holiday.

    An employee of private detective agency Cresco Investigation, Markus Achatzi, is not a member of any of the churches in question. He claimed that he suffered discrimination by being denied public holiday pay for the work he did on Good Friday 2015, and thus sought such pay from his employer.

    In today’s judgment, the EU Court finds that national legislation, such as that at issue, under which, first, Good Friday is a public holiday only for employees who are members of certain Christian churches and, second, only those employees are entitled, if required to work on that public holiday, to additional payment, constitutes direct discrimination on grounds of religion.

    It adds that such legislation cannot be justified either as a measure necessary for the protection of the rights and freedoms of others or as a specific measure intended to compensate for disadvantages linked to religion.

    So until Austria has amended its legislation, in order to restore equal treatment, a private employer who is subject to that legislation is obliged also to grant his other employees a public holiday on Good Friday, provided that they have sought prior permission from their employer to be absent from work on that day, and, consequently, to recognise that those employees are entitled to a payment in addition to their regular salary for work done on that day where the employer has refused to agree to such a request.

    With regard to direct discrimination on grounds of religion, the Court finds that the Austrian legislation at issue gives rise to a difference in treatment that is directly based on the religion of employees. The test used by the legislation in order to differentiate is based directly on whether an employee belongs to a particular religion.

    Further, that legislation has the effect of treating comparable situations differently on the basis of religion. The Court notes, in that regard, in particular, that the grant of a public holiday on Good Friday to an employee who is a member of one of the churches in question is not subject to the condition that the employee must perform a particular religious duty on that day, but is subject only to the condition that such an employee must formally belong to one of those churches. Thus, that employee remains free to choose, as he wishes, how to spend his time on that public holiday, and may, for example, use it for rest or leisure purposes.

    With regard to possible justifications for that direct discrimination, the Court notes that the objective of granting a public holiday on Good Friday to employees who are members of one of the churches in question is to take account of the particular importance of the religious celebrations associated with that day for members of those churches. However, the Court concludes that the legislation at issue cannot be considered necessary for the protection of freedom of religion.

    Provision is made in Austrian law, for employees not belonging to the churches in question, to celebrate a religious festival that does not coincide with any of the standard public holidays in Austria not by the grant of an additional public holiday, but principally by the imposition of a duty of care on employers vis-à-vis their employees, which allows the latter to obtain, if they so wish, the right to be absent from their work for the amount of time necessary to perform certain religious rites.

    Nor can the Austrian legislation at issue be regarded as including specific measures the aim of which is to compensate for a disadvantage linked to religion in accordance with the principle of proportionality and, as far as possible, the principle of equal treatment.

    The provisions at issue grant a 24-hour rest period on Good Friday to employees who are members of one of the churches in question, while employees belonging to other religions, whose important festivals do not coincide with the standard public holidays in Austria, can, in principle, be absent from work in order to perform the religious rites associated with those festivals only if they are so authorised by their employer in accordance with the duty of care. It follows that the measures at issue go beyond what is necessary to compensate for that alleged disadvantage and establish a difference in treatment between employees who are subject to comparable religious duties that does not guarantee, as far as is possible, observance of the principle of equal treatment.

    Judgment in Case C-193/17 – Cresco Investigation GmbH v Markus Achatzi

    Add A Comment
    Leave A Reply Cancel Reply

    You must be logged in to post a comment.

    nps
    • Website

    Related Content

    Danish presidency decorations - Photo © European Union 2025

    New Danish EU presidency aims to deliver on security and competitiveness

    Euro - ECB-Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

    Eurozone investor sentiment remains upbeat – Euro currency news daily

    Van driver - Photo by Kampus Production on Pexels

    Risk Management Strategies for Your Delivery Business

    Accessibility - Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels

    EU accessibility act into force for key digital products

    Christophe Hansen - Photo © European Union 2025

    EU agrees new trade deal with Ukraine

    Space satellites - Photo by Kevin Stadnyk on Unsplash

    EU cuts red tape in space

    LATEST EU NEWS
    Danish presidency decorations - Photo © European Union 2025

    New Danish EU presidency aims to deliver on security and competitiveness

    1 July 2025
    Euro - ECB-Photo by Mika Baumeister on Unsplash

    Eurozone investor sentiment remains upbeat – Euro currency news daily

    1 July 2025
    Accessibility - Photo by RDNE Stock project on Pexels

    EU accessibility act into force for key digital products

    30 June 2025
    Christophe Hansen - Photo © European Union 2025

    EU agrees new trade deal with Ukraine

    30 June 2025
    Space satellites - Photo by Kevin Stadnyk on Unsplash

    EU cuts red tape in space

    30 June 2025

    Subscribe to EUbusiness Week

    Get the latest EU news

    CONTACT INFO

    • EUbusiness Ltd 117 High Street, Chesham Buckinghamshire, HP5 1DE United Kingdom
    • +44(0)20 8058 8232
    • service@eubusiness.com

    INFORMATION

    • About Us
    • Advertising
    • Contact Info

    Services

    • Privacy Policy
    • Terms
    • EU News

    SOCIAL MEDIA

    Facebook
    eubusiness.com © EUbusiness Ltd 2025

    Design and developed by : 

    Type above and press Enter to search. Press Esc to cancel.

    Sign In or Register

    Welcome Back!

    Login to your account below.

    Lost password?