Skip to content. | Skip to navigation

Personal tools
You are here: Home Breaking news EU slaps EUR 12.5m antitrust fine on Nike

EU slaps EUR 12.5m antitrust fine on Nike

27 March 2019, 00:54 CET
— filed under: , ,
EU slaps EUR 12.5m antitrust fine on Nike

Nike - Image BrokenSphere

(BRUSSELS) - The EU Commission fined Nike EUR 12.5 million Monday for banning traders from selling licensed products of some of Europe's best-known football clubs, to other countries within the EEA.

Licensed merchandising products such as mugs, bags, bedsheets, stationery, toys carry one or more logos or images protected by intellectual property rights (IPRs), such as trademarks or copyright. Through a licensing agreement, one party (a licensor) allows another party (a licensee) to use one or more of its IPRs in a certain product. Licensors typically grant non-exclusive licenses to increase the number of merchandising products in the market and their territorial coverage.

Nike's core business is the design and sale of athletic footwear and apparel, including for football clubs and federations, which generally feature Nike's registered trademarks, such as its name or "Swoosh" logo. Other products, so-called "licensed merchandise", only feature the brands of a football club or a federation, not Nike's trademarks. For these products, Nike acts as a licensor of IPRs that grants licences to third parties, who become entitled to manufacture and distribute those products. It is in the context of Nike's role as a licensor for the manufacture and distribution of these licensed merchandise products that the Commission is imposing a fine.

The EU executive opened an antitrust investigation into certain licensing and distribution practices of Nike in June 2017 to assess whether it illegally restricted traders from selling licensed merchandise cross-border and online within the EU Single Market.

The Commission's investigation finds that Nike's non-exclusive licensing and distribution agreements breached EU competition rules. It says that:

  • Nike imposed a number of direct measures restricting out-of-territory sales by licensees, such as clauses explicitly prohibiting these sales, obligations to refer orders for out-of-territory sales to Nike and clauses imposing double royalties for out-of-territory sales.
  • Nike enforced indirect measures to implement the out-of-territory restrictions, for instance threatening licensees with ending their contract if they sold out-of-territory, refusing to supply "official product" holograms if it feared that sales could be going towards other territories in the European Economic Area (EEA), and carrying out audits to ensure compliance with the restrictions.
  • In some cases, Nike used master licensees in each territory to grant sub-licences for the use of the different IPRs to third parties. To secure the practice through the whole distribution chain, Nike imposed direct and indirect measures on master licensees. Through these measures, Nike compelled master licensees to stay within their territories and to enforce restrictions vis-à-vis their sub-licensees.
  • Nike included clauses that explicitly prohibited licensees from supplying merchandising products to customers, often retailers, who could be selling outside the allocated territories. In addition to obliging licensees to pass on these prohibitions in their contracts, Nike would intervene to ensure that retailers (e.g. fashion shops, supermarkets, etc.) stopped purchasing products from licensees in other EEA territories.

The Commission concluded that Nike's illegal practices, which were in force for approximately 13 years (from 1 July 2004 until 27 October 2017), partitioned the Single Market and prevented licensees in Europe from selling products cross-border, to the ultimate detriment of European consumers. Nike's illegal practices affected to varying degrees the licensed merchandise products bearing the brands of clubs like FC Barcelona, Manchester United, Juventus, Inter Milan and AS Roma, as well as national federations like the French Football Federation.

More information on the investigation will be available on the Commission's competition website, in the public case register under the case number AT.40436.

Document Actions