The vast majority of people think that the moment they leave their workstation and head off to enjoy a well-deserved lunch break, their employer’s duty of care leaves with them.

Workplace safety - Photo by Ahmed akach on Pexels

The truth is that, no matter what, your employer’s duty of care does not clock out when you do. In 2024-2025, the number of workers being injured in the workplace is a whopping 680,000. And guess what, not all of the accidents happened during the active work hours, but in the breaks as well.

A slip in the staff cafeteria, a fall in the hallway, or even a hazard in the rest area that was never taken care of. Sound familiar? Well, you might have more legal grounds than you realise, and this is the guide to tell you exactly where you stand.

Are You Still Covered During a Work Break?

The quick answer is: it depends. The fact that you are taking a break does not necessarily cancel out the obligation of care of your employer towards you. Such a responsibility does not simply revert as soon as you leave your desk or workstation.

In case you suffer injury in an area that is under the control of your employer, like a staff canteen, a restroom, or a shared corridor, your employer might nonetheless be at fault on the safety front.

Experts at Nigel Askew Solicitors state that the two main questions courts pose are whether the employer had control over the environment in which the accident occurred and whether a reasonable effort was made to ensure that the environment was safe.

The legal stance, however, takes a new turn in case you stepped out of the workplace completely during your break and were hurt in a different place. All cases are based on their respective facts.

When You Have Grounds to Make a Claim

1. The Accident Happened on Employer-Controlled Premises

In case you have been injured in one of those places that your employer is supposed to maintain, then you can claim. It is the legal obligation of employers to ensure that those spaces are maintained in a fairly safe manner.

2. A Hazard Your Employer Knew About Caused the Injury

If a known hazard contributed to your accident during a break, such as a wet floor or broken furniture, your employer’s failure to correct the problem may be a violation of their duty of care.

3. You Were Carrying Out a Work-Related Task During the Break

Where your break was disrupted by a task at work or you were requested to be on standby, you can still be deemed to be acting in the course of employment when the accident happened.

4. A Third Party on Site Was Responsible for the Accident

In case a contractor, visitor, or third party within the premises caused your injury during a break, you may have a claim against that party or, with your employer, based on the circumstances.

When a Claim May Be More Difficult

1. You Left the Workplace Entirely During Your Break

Establishing employer liability becomes much more difficult in case you were injured off-site when you were on a personal break. The duty of care does not normally accompany you off-site in personal time.

2. The Accident Was Caused Entirely by Your Own Actions

If you were injured as a result of your own actions, which involved a personal risk, with no employer liability, a claim will not succeed regardless of where the accident occurred.

3. The Hazard Was Obvious and You Failed to Take Care

Contributory negligence is a factor taken into account in courts. In the case that risk was apparent and you disregarded it, any settlement awarded may be greatly diminished to represent your own contribution to the accident and injury.

Things You Need to Prove to Make a Claim

1. You Were Entitled to a Safe Working Environment

What you need to prove is that your employer owed you a legal duty of safety in the situation in which the accident was committed. This is normally easy when the injuries committed occur on employer premises during working hours.

2. That Duty Was Breached

The employee must prove that the employer failed to fulfill their obligations according to established standards of work. The process requires you to establish that a typical employer would have recognised the threat and taken measures to prevent the incident from happening.

3. The Breach Directly Caused Your Injury

One needs to demonstrate that there was negligence. You are required to establish a valid connection between the injury that you sustained and the violation committed by your employer. A claim made on its own will not work without this connection.

4. You Suffered a Quantifiable Loss as a Result

Reliable evidence has to be present that you were actually harmed. This involves medical documentation, proof of lost earnings, treatment expenses or any long-term effect of the injury on your work or day-to-day life.

Time Limits for Making a Claim

  • The time limit to initiate legal action is normally three years after an accident has occurred.
  • In case of industrial disease claims, three years period commences at the date of knowledge.
  • When the injured individual is mentally incapable, the time limit can be indefinitely extended.

Conclusion

Accidents that happen during working breaks can attract legitimate litigation, though it will all depend on the circumstances involved. It all depends on where you were, what you were doing, and whether your employer was to bear responsibility or not. Early consultations with a professional injury lawyer can put you in the best situation to understand your rights and maximise the chances that you succeed.

Comments are closed.

eub2 is the default publisher for EUbusiness.

Exit mobile version