Personal tools
Skip to content. Skip to navigation

EUbusiness.com - business, legal and economic news and information from the European Union

Sections
You are here: Home Breaking news Malta aims to erase fiscal deficit by 2010
Document Actions

Malta aims to erase fiscal deficit by 2010

10 May 2008, 14:46 CET

(VALLETTA) - Malta's government pledged to slash its budget deficit to achieve a balance by 2010 as the new eurozone member officially opened its parliament on Saturday following March elections.

President Eddie Fenech Adami also expressed concern over economic conditions worldwide.

"In these last few weeks, the crisis has deepened, and the indications are that matters will take a further turn for the worse. Yet the battle must go on," he said.

The government, elected on March 8th, has a one-seat majority in the now 69-member House of Representatives.

It set a goal of turning the deficit into a surplus by 2010 in part by cutting public spending.

Malta, which joined the eurozone at the start of the year and the EU in 2004, has reduced its budget deficit from 10 percent in 2004 to 1.6 percent of GDP in 2007.

The government is also planning tax reforms to create economic incentives, including lowering income taxes and abolishing departure taxes.

As pledged during the electoral campaign, Fenech Adami said "the government will focus on environmental concerns and issues, which have become matters of national importance.

"A decision has been taken to allocate to environment projects a significant part of the funds that Malta will receive from the European Union. At least 300 million euros (463 million dollars) in EU funds and other public monies will be allocated to this purpose".

Malta will work towards a 20 percent reduction in carbon dioxide emissions by 2020, and towards having 10 percent of its energy come from alternative sources.

Illegal immigration was also evoked. Hundreds of boat people arrive each year in the Mediterranean island mainly from Libya and north Africa.

"The government will continue with its commitment to the problem of illegal immigration, using an approach that strikes a balance between compassion for those who deserve help and a hard line taken with those who have no right of refuge," said Fenech Adami.

Text and Picture Copyright 2008 AFP. All other Copyright 2008 EUbusiness Ltd. All rights reserved. This material is intended solely for personal use. Any other reproduction, publication or redistribution of this material without the written agreement of the copyright owner is strictly forbidden and any breach of copyright will be considered actionable.




Effective Fisical Policy

Posted by Henry Maigurira at 10 May 2008, 16:35 CET
In recent decades, France, Germany, Italy, and Spain—along with most industrial countries—witnessed a sharp rise in the size of government and a large accumulation of public debt. While the latter trend began to reverse under the constraints imposed by the Maastricht Treaty and the Stability and Growth Pact, public expenditure and debt remain high by international standards. These are well-recognized sources of concern to policymakers, especially as the rapid aging of the population increases spending on pensions and health care while reducing the labor force and therefore economic growth and the tax base.

In practice, reducing public spending and government debt is politically difficult because the process inevitably leaves some groups worse off.

Public debt

Posted by Stoyan Antonov at 13 May 2008, 15:49 CET
recently I read an article in "New York Times" - a simple comparison of public debt in USA, UK and Germany: the numbers sited are 162% of GDP is the public debt in UK, for USA the figure is 145% and for Germany it is only 109%. So why is that difference? According to the author in UK and USA there are banking institutions (say some interest groups) which lure public into taking loans (like in UK - they take loans to vacation - according to the author). In Germany - where banks are more or less government controlled - they tend to save money, rather than to spend some. In fact the rising cost of life - minimum life existence level - is raised because of increased spending after energy prices leaping high, after more and more tax money is used for Iraq and Afghanistan
NEWSWIRES
Editorial
China's decision to call off summit with EU is a lost opportunity
EUbusiness Week
Week Ahead
Ecofin Council devoted to EU response to the global economic slowdown
Week Ahead
Cache EUB's Breaking News Portlet as HTML Cache EUB's Upcoming Events Portlet as HTML