Planning for Retirement
27 October 2008by marketresearch -- last modified 27 October 2008
Planning for future pensions — state, occupational and private — is extremely difficult in the context of high economic and political volatility. Investments that have the best growth prospects over the next 30 years include land for forestry and farming, mines and wells, biotechnology, and energy efficiency products and services, but the ordinary pension saver is unlikely to have easy access to pension funds specialising in these sectors.
|
Workers on ordinary incomes have better pension prospects in the public
than the private sector. The high tax rates that will be necessary to
pay public-sector pensions will make it even harder for private-sector
workers to save for their own pensions. In any case, participation in
private and occupational pensions is not common until after the age of
25 and peaks among 45 to 54 year-olds. Problems weighing on pensions
include pensioners' increased longevity, higher taxation demands on
pension funds, the collapse in investment returns in the early 2000s
and in 2008, and the levy to finance the Pension Protection Fund for
occupational schemes. There were only 37,540 open occupational schemes
in the UK in 2006, a fall of 40% since 2000, and within this total
there were fewer than 5,000 open defined-benefit private-sector and
quasi private-sector schemes.
Personal pensions are failing to attract subscribers in
sufficient numbers to compensate for the decline in occupational
pensions. Most personal pension fund sizes are very small. In April
2006, among women aged 35 to 44, 89.8% had less than £30,000 in their
pension fund, compared with 78.7% of men. Self-Invested Personal
Pensions (SIPPs) cater for affluent contributors and are often
restricted to those with pension funds over £100,000. SIPPs enable
contributors to make their own decisions, within some limits, on where
their money is invested.
Personal Accounts are the Government's proposed initiative to increase
the pension savings of people on low to moderate incomes, but are not
planned to start until 2012. Demands on individuals' incomes are
increasing at such a rate in 2008 that the likelihood of greater
voluntary pension saving seems dim, except at the top of the income
scale, and some form of compulsion is looking increasingly inevitable.
The UK's low state pension — £90.70 a week in 2008/2009 — is augmented
by means-tested credits, which are complicated to understand and claim.
The Pensions Reform Group proposed a universal protected pension (UPP)
of 25% to 30% of average earnings, but the Government rejected the
plan, instead choosing Personal Accounts. Personal Accounts —
contributory plans into which workers will be enrolled automatically,
with provision to opt out — should be available from 2012. The
framework for Personal Accounts is in the Pensions Bill 2007, which
also included gradually raising the minimum state pension age to 68,
reducing the number of years of National Insurance contributions to
qualify for a state pension and converting the State Second Pension
(SSP) into a flat-rate supplement. The objective of these changes is to
persuade individuals to take more responsibility for their own
pensions, with the SSP as a safety net for unpaid carers and low
earners.
A more liberal regime for maturing retirement funds began on
6th April 2006. Retirees no longer have to purchase an annuity by age
75, thus opening the door to different retirement products.
There are two main types of equity-release plan: lifetime
mortgages and home-reversion plans. A lifetime mortgage enables the
homeowner to borrow a percentage of the property's value without any
repayments until death or sale. Home-reversion plans allow homeowners
to sell all or a part-share of their home for a capital sum or an
annuity, and the right to remain in the property for life or until
going into long-term care. A high rate of home ownership and inadequate
pension provision have driven the equity-release market.
The equity-release market as a whole has shown undulations
rather than consistent growth, although the flexible lifetime mortgage
segment shows rapid expansion. In a falling property market, guarantees
of no negative equity on lifetime mortgages can be very risky for the
financial-services sector, in similar fashion to subprime loans.
Latent demand for equity release is expected to remain strong,
but there is a risk of a downward wealth spiral, as the retired
generation increasingly cashes in its assets and has little to leave to
its heirs. There is also the possibility that the extent of
remortgaging before retirement could restrict the potential for equity
release after retirement. The rise of sale and rentback is also a
potential threat to future equity release.
The proportion of the UK population needing to worry about wealth
management is, in 2008, falling quite fast, as heavy debts and falling
property prices created a feel-bad factor. On the other hand, the
personal wealth of the most affluent individuals is still increasing.
To an increasing extent, national government revenues come from those
without access to, or from those who choose not to access, these
supra-national circuits.
Wealth management is a niche business, although inheritance-tax
planning has wider relevance, especially in regions with expensive
property. Inheritance-tax planning is most worthwhile for individuals
with estates worth more than £312,000 in 2008/2009. Typically, around
35,000 estates a year are subject to inheritance tax.
Good long-term residential care is very expensive, but less than 0.1%
of the adult population has long-term care insurance. Around one in
five of the over-85s receives long-term care; by 2010, that will be
approximately 280,000 people. In addition, nearly one in ten 65 to 74
year-olds needs long-term care.
Improvements in pensions regulation in Organisation for Economic
Co-operation and Development (OECD) member states adds to the costs of
scheme management and administration, and makes small contributions to
personal and occupational schemes less economic for providers. The
problem of administering small contributions at economic cost will be
an important issue as individuals are told to take more responsibility
for funding their own retirements.
UK pensioners often complain that the state pension is too
low, but the UK compares well with most other EU countries in its total
public expenditure on old-age social benefits. The issue in the UK is
the concentration on means-tested additional benefits, which keep the
basic pension too low to survive on. All over the world, retirees with
inadequate incomes will have to look for work.
Public and private debt will limit individuals' capacity to save for
retirement. In addition, the recent experience of rising longevity
means that more adults have to become carers for older relatives,
restricting their earnings from work.
The productive base of the economy has become too narrow, but energy
shortages will spur economic restructuring that should create a broader
range of job opportunities than at present. On the other hand, in a
future of scarcer and more expensive resources, government will
struggle to maintain, let alone increase, levels of public spending. As
a consequence, it will be difficult to fund health improvements leading
to still higher longevity, and the number of years spent in retirement
could even fall.
The extended family is likely to assume greater importance as a social,
economic and financial-planning unit, provided that forces leading to
family breakdown can be held in check. The relocalisation of industry —
to serve super-expensive and climate-changing transport costs and
emissions — should enable more members of extended families to live
near each other and create mutual support networks. A stronger layer of
small to medium-sized family businesses should contribute to more
equitable income distribution.
Personal Accounts are at the heart of government plans for pension
changes from 2010, but the proposed contribution levels are too low.
Future legislation could include an `ageing levy' added to National
Insurance, to fund long-term care for people without sufficient
resources of their own.
Private-sector developments include Life Trust Holdings' Longevity
Payment Plan, which was launched in January 2008 and provides an income
that increases with age. The US insurer Lincoln launched Elderly Care
Benefit into the UK in 2008. This is a critical illness policy covering
those illnesses that result in the victims needing long-term care.
Family pensions are another idea. The Family Pension Trust from
Rowanmoor Pensions is a self-invested personal pension established
under trust for more than one contributor, either family members or
business partners.
At present, the halfway house of a low basic pension plus extensive
means testing persuades many people against saving. One policy option
for the future is to reduce state retirement spending and force
individuals to take responsibility for funding their own pensions, with
a minimal welfare safety net. Another option is for the state to take
on responsibility for providing a non-means-tested pension that is
sufficient for living in moderate comfort.
Retirement planning is not just about pensions, but should include
wider social policies; for example, to encourage family-based economic
activity and multi-generation housing.
For more info and to buy this report, visit partner retailer's website
Advertisement
